<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Serial novels&#8230; or why we love the BSC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stoneybrooklibrary.wordpress.com/2008/06/27/serial-novels-or-why-we-love-the-bsc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stoneybrooklibrary.wordpress.com/2008/06/27/serial-novels-or-why-we-love-the-bsc/</link>
	<description>Because there can never be enough discussion of a book series that has been out of print for 8 years.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 20:13:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bibberly</title>
		<link>http://stoneybrooklibrary.wordpress.com/2008/06/27/serial-novels-or-why-we-love-the-bsc/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>bibberly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 19:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoneybrooklibrary.wordpress.com/?p=29#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Part of the allure for me was that if you liked a couple of books in the series, you could be more or less guaranteed that you would like the others. I&#039;ve always loved to read, but my book-buying budget as a child was limited, and the nearby library sucked at that time. So when my mom was willing to drive me half an hour to the nearest bookstore, I agonized over spending my money on a book that would be good. Now, granted, I didn&#039;t absolutely love every book in the series that I read (BSC, Sleepover Friends, Treehouse Times, Fifth Grade Stars, Satin Slippers). But they certainly had very little risk of being a total dud. 
I agree that it was good to not have cliffhangers in the BSC. It&#039;s nice to be able to pick up a book anywhere in the series and not be totally lost if you haven&#039;t read the one before. Also, no risk of what happened to the Girl Friends series, where we were left with a cliffhanger that was never resolved. Ever since the next book never came in 1994, I&#039;ve been wondering if it was Cassandra&#039;s boyfriend or his brother who was killed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of the allure for me was that if you liked a couple of books in the series, you could be more or less guaranteed that you would like the others. I&#8217;ve always loved to read, but my book-buying budget as a child was limited, and the nearby library sucked at that time. So when my mom was willing to drive me half an hour to the nearest bookstore, I agonized over spending my money on a book that would be good. Now, granted, I didn&#8217;t absolutely love every book in the series that I read (BSC, Sleepover Friends, Treehouse Times, Fifth Grade Stars, Satin Slippers). But they certainly had very little risk of being a total dud.<br />
I agree that it was good to not have cliffhangers in the BSC. It&#8217;s nice to be able to pick up a book anywhere in the series and not be totally lost if you haven&#8217;t read the one before. Also, no risk of what happened to the Girl Friends series, where we were left with a cliffhanger that was never resolved. Ever since the next book never came in 1994, I&#8217;ve been wondering if it was Cassandra&#8217;s boyfriend or his brother who was killed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
